January 16, 2024

LaTeX Test Article

#demo

Just a test article to check if LaTeX formulas render properly.

Given that ex1ax1=ex2ax2=0e^{x_1}-ax_1=e^{x_2}-ax_2=0, x1x2x_1 \neq x_2, we are to prove:

x1+x2<4lna+23x_1+x_2<\frac{4\ln a+2}{3}

Define f(x)=exaxf(x)=e^x-ax. Since f(x1)=f(x2)=0f(x_1)=f(x_2)=0, we have x1lnx1=lnax_1-\ln x_1=\ln a and x2lnx2=lnax_2-\ln x_2=\ln a.

Define g(x)=xlnxg(x)=x-\ln x. Thus, g(x1)=g(x2)=lnag(x_1)=g(x_2)=\ln a. Since g(x)=x1xg'(x)=\frac{x-1}{x}, g(x)g(x) is strictly decreasing on (0,1)(0,1) and strictly increasing on (1,+)(1,+\infty). Without loss of generality, assume 0<x1<1<x20<x_1<1<x_2.

Substituting lna=x1lnx1\ln a=x_1-\ln x_1 into the target inequality, we transform it into:

x2<x14lnx1+23x_2<\frac{x_1-4\ln x_1+2}{3}

Define h(x)=x4lnx+23h(x)=\frac{x-4\ln x+2}{3}. For x(0,1)x \in (0,1), h(x)=x43x<0h'(x)=\frac{x-4}{3x}<0. Since h(x)h(x) is strictly decreasing on (0,1)(0,1), h(x1)>h(1)=1h(x_1)>h(1)=1. Because x2>1x_2>1, h(x1)>1h(x_1)>1, and g(x)g(x) is strictly increasing on (1,+)(1,+\infty), the inequality is equivalent to:

x1lnx1<g(x14lnx1+23)x_1-\ln x_1<g\left(\frac{x_1-4\ln x_1+2}{3}\right)

Define F(x)=g(x4lnx+23)(xlnx)F(x)=g\left(\frac{x-4\ln x+2}{3}\right)-(x-\ln x) for x(0,1)x \in (0,1). Computing the derivative yields:

F(x)=2M(x)3x(x4lnx+2)F'(x)=\frac{-2M(x)}{3x(x-4\ln x+2)}

where M(x)=x2+4x2(2x+1)lnx5M(x)=x^2+4x-2(2x+1)\ln x-5.

For M(x)M(x) on (0,1)(0,1):

M(x)=2x4lnx2xM'(x)=2x-4\ln x-\frac{2}{x} M(x)=2(x1)2x20M''(x)=\frac{2(x-1)^2}{x^2} \ge 0

Since M(x)0M''(x) \ge 0, M(x)M'(x) is strictly increasing. With limx1M(x)=0\lim_{x \to 1^-} M'(x)=0, we have M(x)<0M'(x)<0. Thus, M(x)M(x) is strictly decreasing. With limx1M(x)=0\lim_{x \to 1^-} M(x)=0, we have M(x)>0M(x)>0.

Because M(x)>0M(x)>0 on (0,1)(0,1), it follows that F(x)<0F'(x)<0. F(x)F(x) is strictly decreasing on (0,1)(0,1). Since limx1F(x)=0\lim_{x \to 1^-} F(x)=0, F(x)>0F(x)>0 for all x(0,1)x \in (0,1).

Therefore, the equivalent inequality holds:

x14lnx1+23>x2\frac{x_1-4\ln x_1+2}{3}>x_2

Substituting 4lnx1=4(lnax1)-4\ln x_1=4(\ln a-x_1):

4lna3x1+23>x2\frac{4\ln a-3x_1+2}{3}>x_2 x1+x2<4lna+23x_1+x_2<\frac{4\ln a+2}{3}